창간 80주년 경향신문

UNESCO vote on Japan’s Hashima Island falls through, marking 1st diplomatic test for Seoul-Tokyo ties under Lee administration



완독

경향신문

공유하기

  • 카카오톡

  • 페이스북

  • X

  • 이메일

보기 설정

글자 크기

  • 보통

  • 크게

  • 아주 크게

컬러 모드

  • 라이트

  • 다크

  • 베이지

  • 그린

컬러 모드

  • 라이트

  • 다크

  • 베이지

  • 그린

본문 요약

인공지능 기술로 자동 요약된 내용입니다. 전체 내용을 이해하기 위해 본문과 함께 읽는 것을 추천합니다.
(제공 = 경향신문&NAVER MEDIA API)

내 뉴스플리에 저장

UNESCO vote on Japan’s Hashima Island falls through, marking 1st diplomatic test for Seoul-Tokyo ties under Lee administration

입력 2025.07.08 17:41

  • Jung Hee-wan
  • 기사를 재생 중이에요

UNESCO vote on Japan’s Hashima Island falls through, marking 1st diplomatic test for Seoul-Tokyo ties under Lee administration

Korea and Japan faced off in a rare vote on the international stage on July 7 over a historical dispute, as the two countries clashed at the UNESCO World Heritage Committee over whether to officially include the issue of Japan’s Hashima Island, also known as Battleship Island, on the meeting agenda. With Korea losing the vote, the issue was excluded from formal discussion.

At its 47th session held in Paris, the World Heritage Committee decided not to adopt the “Review of the Implementation of the Interpretive Strategy on Hashima Island” as a formal agenda item. While Korea had proposed the issue and it was included in the provisional agenda, Japan opposed its adoption. Japan submitted a revised proposal excluding the topic, and when Korea refused to accept it, the matter was put to a vote.

In the secret ballot, Japan’s revised draft passed with 7 votes in favor and 3 against among the 21 committee members. Eight countries abstained, and three votes were invalid. As the committee typically operates by consensus, a vote was considered a rare occurrence.

Prior to the vote, Korea argued that Japan had failed to implement the commitments it made in 2015 when Hashima Island was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site, particularly those related to acknowledging the full history of the island, including the forced labor of Koreans during Japan’s colonial rule. Though Japan had pledged to provide accurate historical interpretation, including references to the forced mobilization of Koreans, nearly a decade has passed with little progress. Tokyo has been accused of backtracking on its promise, raising concerns about historical distortion.

Initially, the issue of Hashima Island had been excluded from this year’s agenda due to Japan’s opposition. However, the Korean government requested that UNESCO include the item, and the UNESCO Secretariat added it as a provisional agenda topic on June 12. Japan reportedly lodged a strong protest with the Secretariat, and despite last-minute negotiations between Seoul and Tokyo, no agreement was reached, resulting in the vote.

The diplomatic standoff may cast a shadow over relations between Korea and Japan, which had shown signs of improvement under President Lee Jae-myung’s administration. The outcome highlights Japan’s continued rigidity on historical issues and may spark criticism over Korea’s diplomatic strategy, especially after a visible defeat in the vote. Both countries had engaged in behind-the-scenes lobbying to secure support from other committee members.

Nevertheless, some observers noted that Korea’s efforts successfully brought international attention to Japan’s failure to follow through on its promises. A Korean foreign ministry official said, “It is regrettable that the necessary votes for the agenda’s adoption were not secured,” adding that Korea plans to formally raise the issue again during the ongoing session. The official also said, “We will continue to press Japan, both bilaterally and multilaterally, to fully implement the World Heritage Committee’s resolutions and the commitments it made itself.”

Since Hashima Island was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2015, the committee has adopted decisions in 2018, 2021, and 2023 urging Japan to take follow-up measures. However, Japan did not establish the promised information center until June 2020, and then placed it in Tokyo, nearly 1,000 kilometers from the island. The center has been criticized for exhibiting only materials denying its mobilization of forced labor. In 2023, a monitor was even installed asserting that Japan’s annexation of Korea in 1910 was legal.

※This article has undergone review by a professional translator after being translated by an AI translation tool.
  • AD
  • AD
  • AD
뉴스레터 구독
닫기

전체 동의는 선택 항목에 대한 동의를 포함하고 있으며, 선택 항목에 대해 동의를 거부해도 서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

보기

개인정보 이용 목적- 뉴스레터 발송 및 CS처리, 공지 안내 등

개인정보 수집 항목- 이메일 주소, 닉네임

개인정보 보유 및 이용기간- 원칙적으로 개인정보 수집 및 이용목적이 달성된 후에 해당정보를 지체없이 파기합니다. 단, 관계법령의 규정에 의하여 보존할 필요가 있는 경우 일정기간 동안 개인정보를 보관할 수 있습니다.
그 밖의 사항은 경향신문 개인정보취급방침을 준수합니다.

보기

경향신문의 새 서비스 소개, 프로모션 이벤트 등을 놓치지 않으시려면 '광고 동의'를 눌러 주세요.

여러분의 관심으로 뉴스레터가 성장하면 뉴욕타임스, 월스트리트저널 등의 매체처럼 좋은 광고가 삽입될 수 있는데요. 이를 위한 '사전 동의'를 받는 것입니다. 많은 응원 부탁드립니다. (광고만 메일로 나가는 일은 '결코' 없습니다.)

뉴스레터 구독
닫기

닫기
닫기

뉴스레터 구독이 완료되었습니다.

개인정보 수집 및 이용
닫기

개인정보 이용 목적- 뉴스레터 발송 및 CS처리, 공지 안내 등

개인정보 수집 항목- 이메일 주소, 닉네임

개인정보 보유 및 이용기간- 원칙적으로 개인정보 수집 및 이용목적이 달성된 후에 해당정보를 지체없이 파기합니다. 단, 관계법령의 규정에 의하여 보존할 필요가 있는 경우 일정기간 동안 개인정보를 보관할 수 있습니다.
그 밖의 사항은 경향신문 개인정보취급방침을 준수합니다.

닫기
광고성 정보 수신 동의
닫기

경향신문의 새 서비스 소개, 프로모션 이벤트 등을 놓치지 않으시려면 '광고 동의'를 눌러 주세요.

여러분의 관심으로 뉴스레터가 성장하면 뉴욕타임스, 월스트리트저널 등의 매체처럼 좋은 광고가 삽입될 수 있는데요. 이를 위한 '사전 동의'를 받는 것입니다. 많은 응원 부탁드립니다. (광고만 메일로 나가는 일은 '결코' 없습니다.)

닫기