창간 80주년 경향신문

Seven years of a void in the system for safe abortion…“The government must take responsibility”



완독

경향신문

공유하기

  • 카카오톡

  • 페이스북

  • X

  • 이메일

보기 설정

글자 크기

  • 보통

  • 크게

  • 아주 크게

컬러 모드

  • 라이트

  • 다크

  • 베이지

  • 그린

컬러 모드

  • 라이트

  • 다크

  • 베이지

  • 그린

본문 요약

인공지능 기술로 자동 요약된 내용입니다. 전체 내용을 이해하기 위해 본문과 함께 읽는 것을 추천합니다.
(제공 = 경향신문&NAVER MEDIA API)

내 뉴스플리에 저장

Seven years of a void in the system for safe abortion…“The government must take responsibility”

입력 2026.04.10 14:58

  • By Kim Seo-Young

This article was translated by an AI tool. Feedback Here.

Seven years of a void in the system for safe abortion…“The government must take responsibility”
Seven years of a void in the system for safe abortion…“The government must take responsibility”

Ahead of the 11th, which marks seven full years since the ‘abortion crime’ in the Criminal Act received a ruling of constitutional inconsistency, feminist groups have come forward to condemn the government for shirking responsibility.

On the 10th, the Network for Guaranteeing the Right to Safe Abortion for All (Moimnet) pointed out that, due to a seven-year legislative and institutional vacuum, women have been unable to enjoy the right to obtain a safe abortion and have had to ‘fend for themselves’. In a statement, they said, “We are still being refused abortions at hospitals, searching for information through private posts and confidential counseling, missing the period during which a prompt and safe abortion can be obtained, and failing to have our rights guaranteed.”

[Flat] “Introduction of abortion pills is possible without amending the law,” opinions received but concealed by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety

Moimnet stated, “The Ministry of Health and Welfare could and should have carried out many tasks, including surveying the current status of abortion-related health care, introducing abortion-inducing medications, providing health insurance coverage, building a medical system for a safe abortion environment, establishing counseling and information-provision systems, and constructing referral and support systems.” It added, “However, as a result of doing nothing, every system remains neglected in a state no different from the era of the abortion crime.” Moimnet announced a rally around Tapgol Park in Jongno-gu, Seoul, on the 11th.

South Korea has classified ‘abortion’ as a crime since the Criminal Act was enacted in 1953. Then, in April 2019, the Constitutional Court ruled that it “excessively infringes on the self-determination of pregnant women,” and that “the grounds for justification under the Mother and Child Health Act do not at all encompass the diverse and broad conflict situations surrounding abortion due to social⋅economic reasons,” and delivered a decision of constitutional inconsistency on the Criminal Act provisions on the abortion offense (self-abortion and consensual abortion).

On April 11, 2022, in front of the Constitutional Court in Jongno-gu, Seoul, activists campaigning to abolish the abortion crime cheer as the court delivers a ruling of constitutional inconsistency on a constitutional complaint concerning the abortion offense. Lee Jun-Heon, reporter

On April 11, 2022, in front of the Constitutional Court in Jongno-gu, Seoul, activists campaigning to abolish the abortion crime cheer as the court delivers a ruling of constitutional inconsistency on a constitutional complaint concerning the abortion offense. Lee Jun-Heon, reporter

At the time, the Constitutional Court recommended replacement legislation by December 31, 2020. A decision of constitutional inconsistency temporarily allows the law to remain in force to avoid a legal vacuum and social confusion that would follow immediate nullification. To honor the purpose of that decision, related legislation and systems should have been prepared, yet follow-up legislation remains absent even now, seven years later. As of January 1, 2021, the abortion-crime provisions lost effect, but the right to terminate a pregnancy remains left in a blind spot.

Related bills were introduced over the years, but all were discarded due to the expiration of National Assembly terms, as views diverged over the permissible scope and grounds for abortion by gestational age. In the current 22nd National Assembly, Progressive Party lawmaker Son Sol recently introduced as lead sponsor a ‘Partial Amendment to the Mother and Child Health Act’. Son stated, “Although the relevant provisions lost effect on January 1, 2021, the failure to amend related statutes since then has intensified confusion on the ground.” The bill centers on changing the term ‘induced abortion’ to ‘induced termination of pregnancy’, encompassing methods such as medication in addition to surgery, and deleting limits on permission for surgical induced abortion.

[Flat] Six and a half years after the abortion crime disappeared…what has happened since

[Flat] “Looking for Mifjin”··· Will the ‘introduction of abortion pills’ promised by President Lee Jae Myung be realized

Meanwhile, the Lee Jae Myung administration is pursuing, as state agenda, both ‘improving abortion-related laws and systems’ and ‘introducing abortion medications’ to safeguard the safety and health rights of women. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designated abortion medications such as mifepristone (Mifjin) as safe and effective essential medicines and has recommended their use at 10 to 12 weeks of pregnancy. More than 90 countries permit Mifjin.

  • AD
  • AD
  • AD
뉴스레터 구독
닫기

전체 동의는 선택 항목에 대한 동의를 포함하고 있으며, 선택 항목에 대해 동의를 거부해도 서비스 이용이 가능합니다.

보기

개인정보 이용 목적- 뉴스레터 발송 및 CS처리, 공지 안내 등

개인정보 수집 항목- 이메일 주소, 닉네임

개인정보 보유 및 이용기간- 원칙적으로 개인정보 수집 및 이용목적이 달성된 후에 해당정보를 지체없이 파기합니다. 단, 관계법령의 규정에 의하여 보존할 필요가 있는 경우 일정기간 동안 개인정보를 보관할 수 있습니다.
그 밖의 사항은 경향신문 개인정보취급방침을 준수합니다.

보기

경향신문의 새 서비스 소개, 프로모션 이벤트 등을 놓치지 않으시려면 '광고 동의'를 눌러 주세요.

여러분의 관심으로 뉴스레터가 성장하면 뉴욕타임스, 월스트리트저널 등의 매체처럼 좋은 광고가 삽입될 수 있는데요. 이를 위한 '사전 동의'를 받는 것입니다. 많은 응원 부탁드립니다. (광고만 메일로 나가는 일은 '결코' 없습니다.)

뉴스레터 구독
닫기

닫기
닫기

뉴스레터 구독이 완료되었습니다.

개인정보 수집 및 이용
닫기

개인정보 이용 목적- 뉴스레터 발송 및 CS처리, 공지 안내 등

개인정보 수집 항목- 이메일 주소, 닉네임

개인정보 보유 및 이용기간- 원칙적으로 개인정보 수집 및 이용목적이 달성된 후에 해당정보를 지체없이 파기합니다. 단, 관계법령의 규정에 의하여 보존할 필요가 있는 경우 일정기간 동안 개인정보를 보관할 수 있습니다.
그 밖의 사항은 경향신문 개인정보취급방침을 준수합니다.

닫기
광고성 정보 수신 동의
닫기

경향신문의 새 서비스 소개, 프로모션 이벤트 등을 놓치지 않으시려면 '광고 동의'를 눌러 주세요.

여러분의 관심으로 뉴스레터가 성장하면 뉴욕타임스, 월스트리트저널 등의 매체처럼 좋은 광고가 삽입될 수 있는데요. 이를 위한 '사전 동의'를 받는 것입니다. 많은 응원 부탁드립니다. (광고만 메일로 나가는 일은 '결코' 없습니다.)

닫기